Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction
In functional analysis, a discipline within mathematics, given a -algebra , the Gelfand–Naimark–Segal construction establishes a correspondence between cyclic -representations of and certain linear functionals on (called states). The correspondence is shown by an explicit construction of the -representation from the state. It is named for Israel Gelfand, Mark Naimark, and Irving Segal.
States and representations
[edit]A -representation of a -algebra on a Hilbert space is a mapping from into the algebra of bounded operators on such that
- is a ring homomorphism which carries involution on into involution on operators
- is nondegenerate, that is the space of vectors is dense as ranges through and ranges through . Note that if has an identity, nondegeneracy means exactly is unit-preserving, i.e. maps the identity of to the identity operator on .
A state on a -algebra is a positive linear functional of norm . If has a multiplicative unit element this condition is equivalent to .
For a representation of a -algebra on a Hilbert space , an element is called a cyclic vector if the set of vectors
is norm dense in , in which case π is called a cyclic representation. Any non-zero vector of an irreducible representation is cyclic. However, non-zero vectors in a general cyclic representation may fail to be cyclic.
The GNS construction
[edit]Let be a -representation of a -algebra on the Hilbert space and be a unit norm cyclic vector for . Then is a state of .
Conversely, every state of may be viewed as a vector state as above, under a suitable canonical representation.
Theorem.[1] — Given a state of , there is a -representation of acting on a Hilbert space with distinguished unit cyclic vector such that for every in .
- Construction of the Hilbert space
Define on a semi-definite sesquilinear form
By the triangle inequality, the degenerate elements, in satisfying , form a vector subspace of . By a -algebraic argument, one can show that is a left ideal of (known as the left kernel of ). In fact, it is the largest left ideal in the null space of ρ. The quotient space of by the vector subspace is an inner product space with the inner product defined by, which is well-defined due to the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality. The Cauchy completion of in the norm induced by this inner product is a Hilbert space, which we denote by . - Construction of the representation Define the action of on by of on . The same argument showing is a left ideal also implies that is a bounded operator on and therefore can be extended uniquely to the completion. Unravelling the definition of the adjoint of an operator on a Hilbert space, turns out to be -preserving. This proves the existence of a -representation .
- Identifying the unit norm cyclic vector
If has a multiplicative identity , then it is immediate that the equivalence class in the GNS Hilbert space containing is a cyclic vector for the above representation. If is non-unital, take an approximate identity for . Since positive linear functionals are bounded, the equivalence classes of the net converges to some vector in , which is a cyclic vector for .
It is clear from the definition of the inner product on the GNS Hilbert space that the state can be recovered as a vector state on . This proves the theorem.
The method used to produce a -representation from a state of in the proof of the above theorem is called the GNS construction. For a state of a -algebra , the corresponding GNS representation is essentially uniquely determined by the condition, as seen in the theorem below.
Theorem.[2] — Given a state of , let , be -representations of on Hilbert spaces , respectively each with unit norm cyclic vectors , such that for all . Then , are unitarily equivalent -representations i.e. there is a unitary operator from to such that for all in . The operator that implements the unitary equivalence maps to for all in .
Significance of the GNS construction
[edit]The GNS construction is at the heart of the proof of the Gelfand–Naimark theorem characterizing -algebras as algebras of operators. A -algebra has sufficiently many pure states (see below) so that the direct sum of corresponding irreducible GNS representations is faithful.
The direct sum of the corresponding GNS representations of all states is called the universal representation of . The universal representation of contains every cyclic representation. As every -representation is a direct sum of cyclic representations, it follows that every -representation of is a direct summand of some sum of copies of the universal representation.
If is the universal representation of a -algebra , the closure of in the weak operator topology is called the enveloping von Neumann algebra of . It can be identified with the double dual .
Irreducibility
[edit]Also of significance is the relation between irreducible -representations and extreme points of the convex set of states. A representation π on is irreducible if and only if there are no closed subspaces of which are invariant under all the operators other than itself and the trivial subspace .
Theorem — The set of states of a -algebra with a unit element is a compact convex set under the weak- topology. In general, (regardless of whether or not has a unit element) the set of positive functionals of norm is a compact convex set.
Both of these results follow immediately from the Banach–Alaoglu theorem.
In the unital commutative case, for the -algebra of continuous functions on some compact , Riesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem says that the positive functionals of norm are precisely the Borel positive measures on with total mass . It follows from Krein–Milman theorem that the extremal states are the Dirac point-mass measures.
On the other hand, a representation of is irreducible if and only if it is one-dimensional. Therefore, the GNS representation of corresponding to a measure is irreducible if and only if is an extremal state. This is in fact true for -algebras in general.
Theorem — Let be a -algebra. If is a -representation of on the Hilbert space with unit norm cyclic vector , then is irreducible if and only if the corresponding state is an extreme point of the convex set of positive linear functionals on of norm .
To prove this result one notes first that a representation is irreducible if and only if the commutant of , denoted by , consists of scalar multiples of the identity.
Any positive linear functionals on dominated by is of the form for some positive operator in with in the operator order. This is a version of the Radon–Nikodym theorem.
For such , one can write as a sum of positive linear functionals: . So is unitarily equivalent to a subrepresentation of . This shows that π is irreducible if and only if any such is unitarily equivalent to , i.e. is a scalar multiple of , which proves the theorem.
Extremal states are usually called pure states. Note that a state is a pure state if and only if it is extremal in the convex set of states.
The theorems above for -algebras are valid more generally in the context of -algebras with approximate identity.
Generalizations
[edit]The Stinespring factorization theorem characterizing completely positive maps is an important generalization of the GNS construction.
History
[edit]Gelfand and Naimark's paper on the Gelfand–Naimark theorem was published in 1943.[3] Segal recognized the construction that was implicit in this work and presented it in sharpened form.[4]
In his paper of 1947 Segal showed that it is sufficient, for any physical system that can be described by an algebra of operators on a Hilbert space, to consider the irreducible representations of a -algebra. In quantum theory this means that the -algebra is generated by the observables. This, as Segal pointed out, had been shown earlier by John von Neumann only for the specific case of the non-relativistic Schrödinger-Heisenberg theory.[5]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- William Arveson, An Invitation to C*-Algebra, Springer-Verlag, 1981
- Kadison, Richard, Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras, Vol. I : Elementary Theory, American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0821808191.
- Jacques Dixmier, Les C*-algèbres et leurs Représentations, Gauthier-Villars, 1969.
English translation: Dixmier, Jacques (1982). C*-algebras. North-Holland. ISBN 0-444-86391-5. - Thomas Timmermann, An invitation to quantum groups and duality: from Hopf algebras to multiplicative unitaries and beyond, European Mathematical Society, 2008, ISBN 978-3-03719-043-2 – Appendix 12.1, section: GNS construction (p. 371)
- Stefan Waldmann: On the representation theory of deformation quantization, In: Deformation Quantization: Proceedings of the Meeting of Theoretical Physicists and Mathematicians, Strasbourg, May 31-June 2, 2001 (Studies in Generative Grammar) , Gruyter, 2002, ISBN 978-3-11-017247-8, p. 107–134 – section 4. The GNS construction (p. 113)
- G. Giachetta, L. Mangiarotti, G. Sardanashvily (2005). Geometric and Algebraic Topological Methods in Quantum Mechanics. World Scientific. ISBN 981-256-129-3.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Shoichiro Sakai, C*-Algebras and W*-Algebras, Springer-Verlag 1971. ISBN 3-540-63633-1
Inline references
[edit]- ^ Kadison, R. V., Theorem 4.5.2, Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras, Vol. I : Elementary Theory, American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0821808191
- ^ Kadison, R. V., Proposition 4.5.3, Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras, Vol. I : Elementary Theory, American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0821808191
- ^ I. M. Gelfand, M. A. Naimark (1943). "On the imbedding of normed rings into the ring of operators on a Hilbert space". Matematicheskii Sbornik. 12 (2): 197–217. (also Google Books, see pp. 3–20)
- ^ Richard V. Kadison: Notes on the Gelfand–Neimark theorem. In: Robert C. Doran (ed.): C*-Algebras: 1943–1993. A Fifty Year Celebration, AMS special session commemorating the first fifty years of C*-algebra theory, January 13–14, 1993, San Antonio, Texas, American Mathematical Society, pp. 21–54, ISBN 0-8218-5175-6 (available from Google Books, see pp. 21 ff.)
- ^ I. E. Segal (1947). "Irreducible representations of operator algebras" (PDF). Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 53 (2): 73–88. doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1947-08742-5.